With so many farmers dry seeding crops to maximise potential yield, the loss of key post emergent herbicides through resistance makes it is even more important that weed control is planned before seeding.

Unfortunately many growers are unknowingly spending tens of thousands of dollars on ineffective herbicides. Gut-feelings and wishful thinking are no substitute for hard data and sound analysis. 

This is no way to develop a weed management plan!

To put this in perspective the 2010 pre-harvest survey in Western Australia by AHRI showed that over 80% of wild radish plants tested were resistant to Group B SU’s, 50% to Group B ‘imis’, 50% to Group F, and 70% to 2,4-D. Also Group B and Group A ‘fops’ were virtually useless on most annual ryegrass populations and clethodim was failing at an alarming rate. Five years later, the situation is much worse.

AGRONOMO and Peter Boutsalis at Plant Science Consulting offer you the chance to beat the resistance challenge in 2016 by conducting weed seed testing for which herbicides still work! Combined AGRONOMO and Plant Science Consulting have 50 years of weed and herbicide resistance expertise.

Seed testing requires the collection of weed seed samples before harvest and mailed to the lab. Once received dormancy of the seed is broken and seedlings grown before spraying with the herbicides determined as relevant to your farming system. Level of susceptibility for each herbicide tested is then measured. Results are normally available in early March.

Seed testing is an effective for both pre-emergent (trifluralin, Sakura®, Boxer® Gold) and post emergent herbicides.

A range of packages are available. Packages start with DIY seed collection and submitting samples for testing with report showing the effective herbicides.

Premium packages includes on-farm consultation, seed collection, advice on herbicide selection for testing, susceptibility testing, and a detailed report and management plan for the next three to five years.

For more information on Herbicide Susceptibility Testing go to /herbicide-suscept-testing/

Or phone on (Western Standard Time)

Andrew Storrie 0428 423 577

It had to happen. In the latest of a long line of “wake-up” calls, there is confirmation of resistance to four herbicide modes of action in a ‘Top 100 World’s Worst crop weeds’ population. The scary thing is that three of these modes of action are our major knockdown herbicides glyphosate, paraquat and glufosinate. The fourth is Group A.

The research confirming 4 modes of action in the one population of crowsfoot grass (Eleusine indica) from Malaysia has just been published in a paper by Jalaludin, Yu and Powles (Team AHRI) in the journal Weed Research.

Crowsfoot grass is a C4 tropical-sub tropical grass that behaves as either an annual or perennial and can produce up to 50,000 seeds per plant. It is a rampant weed of pastures, annual crops, horticulture/plantations and non-crop areas, such as roadsides. This species is also in the top 200 worst environmental weeds in south east Queensland. In 2012 David Thornby et al rated crowsfoot grass the 16^th most likely weed to develop glyphosate resistance in Australia.

 The map below however shows that complacency should not be entertained as this species is widely distributed across Australia, and is particularly vigorous above 30 degrees lattitude.

Distribution of Eleusine indica in Australia. Source: Australian Virtual Herbarium

Resistance in crowsfoot grass

Crowsfoot grass has a trail of herbicide resistant populations across 8 countries to 7 different modes of action. It was the second species in the world to develop resistance to glyphosate. Table 1 below shows the year the mode of action was first confirmed by country.

Year first confirmed	Mode of action	Herbicide common name	Country
1973	D	trifluralin	USA
1989	B	imazapyr	Costa Rica
1990	A	fluazifop	Malaysia
1990	L	paraquat	Malaysia
1997	M + A	glyphosate + fluazifop	Malaysia
2003	C	metribuzin	USA
2009	N	glufosinate	Malaysia
2009	L + N	paraquat + glufosinate	Malaysia
2014	A, L, M, N	fluazifop, paraquat, glyphosate, glufosinate	Malaysia

 Table 1. First case of herbicide resistance confirmed in crowsfoot grass to different modes of action.

To date no populations of crowsfoot grass in Australia have been confirmed resistant to any herbicide mode of action.

Why is it so??

Malaysia is obviously a hot-spot of resistance with this species so what is it about this country that makes it this way?

• Wet tropical climate that stimulates multiple weed emergences through the year
• Large populations of rapidly growing weeds.
• Major reliance on herbicides to control weeds – up to 12 applications per year
• No seed bank management of weeds
• There is a large area of ‘plantation’ agriculture, with 5 million hectares planted to oil palms (2011) alone. This creates large areas where weeds can grow with little competition from the crop.

Oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) bunch that can weigh up to 15 kg.

What will be the next action to manage this weed in Malaysia? There are two modes of action remaining - amitrole from Group O and 2,2-DPA and flupropanate from Group J. None of these have the effectiveness or flexibility of the herbicides already lost. Non hebicide options will also be less effective and difficult to implement.

Remember that in late 2013 annual ryegrass from a vineyard in Western Australia was confirmed as being resistant to both glyphosate and paraquat? This occurred due to the sequential use of both herbicides over a decade or more, with no action preventing surviving plants from setting viable seed.

How do we avoid going down this 'one-way elevator'?

As outlined in the GRDC Integrated weed management manual controlling the survivors of any herbicide application is the key stone of resistance management.

Simply going from one herbicide mode of action to the next produces weeds with resistance to multiple modes of action. Imagine losing the effectiveness of glyphosate and paraquat in your major weed species!

To manage these seed banks and drive down weed numbers we need to use a wide a range of weed control techniques as possible. This has been the message since 1990. For a bit of nostalgia here are some of the slogans that have been used in the past....

                      

 And now.........

                                                      

This is the same message in different words and continues to be relevant today.

For further information on the multiple resistance research go here.

The Australian Glyphosate Sustainability Group has now added a searchable database to there highly informative site.

You can can now search for glyphosate resistance by:

• species
• State
• Region

This will give growers, advisers and policy makers the ability to get a better idea of where glyphosate resistance is occuring and how many populations have been found.

Currently it is best viewed in Internet Explorer and Chrome.

Just received the official Quick-test® results on the paraquat resistant ryegrass from the southern WA vineyard and low and behold, we also have moderate glyphosate resistance.

The virtual loss of the two main knockdown herbicide modes of action begs the question about longer term weed management in all vineyards. The owners have recently used a robust rate of Fusilade® to kill the ryegrass. I have suggested however that while this solves a short term problem Group A herbicides should not be used by themselves in the longer term.

This situation is an excellent example of how rotating herbicide modes of action only delays the development of resistance while creating multiple resistance in the longer term.

What must be used is a series of tactics (herbicide and mechanical) within a season that ensures that potentially resistance survivors of the previous tactic are prevented from setting seed. This is the ONLY way you manage herbicide resistance. Ensure you always use the higher end of the herbicide label rate with the best possible application methods and under the best possible conditions.